particularly in my career I find that there is a fairly good
curriculum, although the elective courses are a little useful in practice for
some, others serve us well to level in comparison to other colleagues, I also
like that it is mandatory to participate in artistic courses, sports, etc., I
find that it is a good enough way to release stress in the university years.
What I do not like is that they have eliminated professional practices, since
in my opinion it is a first way to face what comes later as future workers and
social workers. In the same way I like the plurality of the mesh, since it has
statistics, research methodology, philosophy, economics, psychology, social
justice and law, among many other very strong and good branches in my own
opinion.
Now, later on, the cores come to us, which we have to choose
and it is in replacement of the practices for what I understood, so all of us
will have to make an important decision and choose, postulate and see if we are
in that nucleus, it is quite intense that process in my opinion, but I'm
excited to continue, I'm very excited about next year and I have many
expectations in front of this.
I hope not to be disillusioned or demotivated for not being
in some nucleus of choice, but as my classmates comment larger, one is left in
his first choice. I hope everyone can be in their choices and preferred nuclei,
with their teachers and peers with their same vocational orientations.

